I recently did a makeover to two sites, TraverseLaw.com and WardropLaw.com. I was given the design to use for the first and used a friend to help me with the creative spark on the second one. I of course did all of the coding for both of them. I would appreciate any coding and usability comments about the sites. Are they usable? Do you experience any difficulties navigating around them or experience broken code? I don’t really need feedback on the looks of the sites as that is now set for the most part.
On that same thought process, a friend of mine over at em two design just showed me this site called YourSexyLife.com that they have completed. I really like that design. I think it is probably on my top ten list of all time favorite looks. The site is interesting because it is about living a full life, with sex or celibate, in a way that is sexy. As her tag line says, “sassy, yet classy”. It isn’t the typical type of site I would visit, and yet it somehow drew me in for a read. I was disappointed that she didn’t permit comments, but I guess with a name like that she is worried what she might get back. My friend was showing me the site to show me the quality she was able to obtain on the main gif image on the site. Impressive work!
December 22nd, 2005 at 5:40 pm
Thanks Don. I’m sure my client will appreciate the plug here, too 🙂
December 23rd, 2005 at 10:08 am
Don, I like both of these sites. Probably Wardrop & Wardrop for the look and feel. I’m not a fan of Times Roman fonts used on Bowerman, Bowden and Moothart, probably because every damn thing I see at work is written in them, but it may well be appropriate for a law firm site.
I would make 2 suggestions for Bowerman, Bowden and Moothart:
Well you did ask for suggestions for two good looking sites, so I couldn’t help but go to a fine level of detail!
Cheers,
Gary