Microsoft has confirmed suspicions that it was targeting WINE (recursive acronym for “Wine Is Not an Emulator). WINE is a compatibility layer that tricks Windows applications into thinking they are running on Windows when in fact they are running on Linux or Unix. In their new Windows update tool, Microsoft specifically looks for the presence of WINE elements and generates an error message if it finds them. They (Microsoft) may be within their rights to block access to Windows updates to machines not running Windows, but if they start blocking people from other updates, (like MS Office) then it is likely to become an issue of sorts in the community. The WINE folks don’t seem miffed at all, in fact looking at their site, it gives the impression that they are happy about it because it shows that Microsoft views them as a threat. Read the full story here.

And people said Microsoft didn’t care about virus issues? The technology used to fight spam is being explored as a logical model to attack the AIDS virus. Nebojsa Jojic, a University of Illinois scholar who has been involved in Microsoft Research for some time says that the patterns exhibited by the AIDS virus in some ways mimic the messages carried via spam. You can only change the pattern so much before it becomes ineffective. This may be the real story of Microsoft fighting viruses.

If the research is successful, it can be expanded to other illnesses. According to Microsoft Research pages, “Laboratory tests began this month on vaccine models developed using these Microsoft Research-aided approaches. The tests are the first step in what could be years of additional research and trials to determine the effectiveness of these models and determine if they could be used to develop vaccines for hepatitis C and other mutating viruses.”

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has more on the issue in a recent article.

For those of you that always just click “I ACCEPT” when it comes to your Windows and other Microsoft software license agreements, here is the low tech and somewhat humorous explanation of what you’re missing. Strangely enough, it is actually pretty close to the mark terminology aside, because he doesn’t appear to have said anything that is strictly incorrect. Good for a laugh and might cause some to actually read their End User License Agreement (EULA) in the future (and if you find doing that humorous, then you should join Law school immediately.)

While on the subjects of humour and Microsoft licensing, this little cartoon from userfriendly.org goes into the Microsoft spyware license that gives you a maximum of 5 whole dollars if your system gets trashed.

Mozilla have released an updated version of their Firefox web browser (1.0.1) to change their support for IDN (International Domain Names) after a flaw was found in all existing browser implementations of IDN. The updated Firefox can be downloaded here. IDN will no doubt be re-enabled once the standard implementation is fixed. I doubt that 99% of the population will even notice the IDN issue. Basically the updated Firefox will display the “punycode” in the status bar, so that the paypal phish shown at above link would appear in the status bar as http://www.pаypal.com/ which should indicate to everyone that the URL is bogus.

The Britich Government has launched what appears to be a very sophomoric site in an effort to help people stay ahead of the bad guys propogating viruses and spyware. It suggests for example that you keep your Windows Operating System up to date. It doesn’t suggest basic things like, use Firefox, Thunderbird, Mac or Linux Operating Systems, etc. I would expect a high school class trying to assemble a site of this nature to have done a more complete job of it.

It promises in the future that it will help avoid virus threats to computers, mobile phones, white goods (like fridges, etc. that can be controlled by remote — can’t you see it, a whole country with ruined Christmas dinners because of a rogue virus turning up the temp on the ovens?). Anyway, I hope it develops, but it appears to us to be a weak effort, probably designed to get someone’s tail off the firing line because they can claim they are working on the problem.

To see future trends in the computer industry, one can often look to see what the guys that will be working in and for the big tech companies in the future are learning now. With that thought in mind, it is worth looking at this article in the Yaledailynews. This quote in particular stood out to me.

In Yale’s Computer Science Department and CS computing cluster, also known as the Zoo, the UNIX-based Linux is the platform of choice. The Linux operating system benefits from a usership that actively tries to improve its function.

Yale isn’t the only university using Linux for training purposes, after all, Linux is perfect for the task in a way that Windows can never be, namely that you can look at, and experiment on the source code of Linux, then compile your changes and see how they work. That reason alone is enough to make it the choice of platform in courses based around OS platform design and implementation. For those purposes, Windows is almost completely useless.
The interesting question is, “What happens when these guys are all employed in the IT industry?” Linux will be their OS of choice, they will know it inside and out, and will be encouraging it’s usage with whomever they end up working for. To a degree this is already happening, and it will only grow as time goes on.
Yale’s email system has been migrated to Linux as well apparently, and this quote from the article explains why.

“Linux is really exploding in the back-office area with servers,” Long said. “We can see the source for it — we know what’s going on. It’s economic, and colleagues at other universities are using it as well, so we can learn from them, too.”

So when evaluating Linux for your needs, perhaps you should listen to the people actually using it rather then listening to sales pitches from Microsoft and/or Sun and those employed by them.

An interesting story here tells of a restaurant in New Zealand that failed to keep their online menu and price list up to date. As a result they were fined 3000 NZ dollars and ordered to pay court costs of a further 260 dollars. Apparently, they were advised several times of the discrepancies and failed to take appropriate action and pled guilty to breaching the Fair Trading Act. This is a very interesting issue for web masters of e-commerce sites, and I doubt it will be long before we start seeing such cases popping up all over. I imagine it is very important that if your site doesn’t always exactly match reality, that you have a disclaimer stating that there might be discrepancies.